What Is the OH Functional Group Called

Its important to know the names of the organic functional groups since they appear again and again in structures. Heres a look at what the OH functional group is called. Question: What Is the OH Functional Group Called? Answer: The -OH functional group is the hydroxyl group. OH is an alcohol consisting of an oxygen atom bonded to a hydrogen atom. When this functional group appears in a molecule, the prefix used is hydroxy. Hydroxyl and Hydroxy Group Properties One of the key properties of the OH group is that is is readily deprotonated. This occurs because hydrogen and oxygen have different electronegativity values. Group that contain this functional group tend to have higher melting and boiling points than compounds that lack the group. This is due to hydrogen bonding between molecules. The presence of the group also aids solubility of organic compounds in water.

Nlrb On Behalf Of Mrs. Dawn Vs. American Medical Response...

Case Title : NLRB on behalf of Mrs. Dawn vs. American Medical Response of Connecticut Company Case number: 34-CA-012576 Date Opened: 01/19/2010 Status: closed Presentation of the Case The case filed by NLRB was between the American Medical Response of Connecticut in New Haven and one of their employees called Mrs. Dawn. Upon verbal disagreement with her supervisor, Mrs. Dawn posted a negative remark on her private facebook wall about the supervisor. The remark attracted comments from her staff mates. On reporting to work the following day, she was suspended and later fired. The company argued that her act was a violation of their internet policy by criticizing her overseer online. The Hartford NLRB office filed a complaint of unlawful dismissal of Mrs. Dawn stating that the party was involved in protected concerted activity on Facebook at the time when she criticized her senior. In addition, NLRB identified several unlawful provisions within the company’s manual of conduct. However, before hearing, the company opted for an out of court settlement with Mrs. Dawn besides revising their unlawful provisions in their handbook. Rationale of the NLRB Decision I agree with NLRB’s decision since Dawn activity can be classified as a concerted activity. Reflectively, a concerted activity is that which involves an employee expressing views t other employees with the intention of either criticizing or suggesting an alternative response to mistreatment at place of work.Show MoreRelatedFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 PagesEstablishing Rewards and Pay Plans 260 Employee Benefits 286 Ensuring a Safe and Healthy Work Environment 312 PART 6 Chapter 14 LABOR–MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTS Understanding Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining 340 Endnotes 367 Glossary 389 Company Index 395 Subject Index 398 v Contents PART 1 UNDERSTANDING HRM Chapter 1 The Dynamic Environment of HRM 2 Learning Outcomes 2 Introduction 4 5 Understanding Cultural Environments 4 The Changing World of Technology What Is a Knowledge Worker

Constitutional Democracy Essay Example For Students

Constitutional Democracy Essay In the formulating of a constitutional democracy, the Framers wereinfluenced by two governmental theories: John Lockes natural rightsphilosophy and the ideals of classical republicanism from the Greeks andRomans. Lockes philosophy pondered on the importance of individual rightsand self-interest. People who live under a certain government have a social contractwith their political representatives, or the government. The have anagreement that as long as the government protects the natural rights of thepeople, then they consent to give up a portion of their freedom and abideby all the laws of the said government. George Washington, one of theFounders of the US Constitution, told members of the Tuoro Synagogue in1790, Happily, the government of the United States that gives to bigotryno sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who liveunder its protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving ittheir effectual support. However, what happens when the government stopsworking for its people. The Right to Revolution allows for assembly ofthe people to overthrow the government. Since the Constitution was really a compilation of all the knowledgeand wisdom from the past, it is very obvious that much thought and time wasput into the writing of this document. Its ideas and principles wereworking for the citizens of the United States up to this present time. TheUS government is still the authority of the country and despiteoccasionally being questioned, has never been overthrown. We agree withWebster that the US Constitution is a collection of the wisdom for allages. Some people might think that theres no way for it to include allthe knowledge and wisdom for all of time. Some of its addressed items areslightly indirect. One such clause that contains enough elasticity to bebroad and cover a wide range of rights is the necessary and properclause, which enables Congress to create the necessary and proper laws inorder for them to carry out the powers delegated to them by theConstitution. There are also the 27 Amendments to the Constitution thatwas written and appro ved to protect the individual and in the 14thSelective Inclusion Clause to demand that states now protect individualrights. This Constitution, with the help of the ninth Amendment ofunenumerated rights, was left broad enough to cover every aspect ofcitizenship, government and the protection of natural rights. An empire of reason could be considered a system under which thecountry is run on sensible and realistic views and principles: views thataccentuate on common welfare, principles that are broad enough to refer toall people yet still strict enough as to restrict certain unreasonablebehavior, and views that address the people with a sense of authority thatstill leaves room to show respect towards its citizens. It is reasonableto assume the American Republic is an empire of reason. Many great mindsworked together to create this miracle at the Philadelphia Convention.Thomas Jefferson argued that although the Constitution was well written, itstill needed a Bill of Rights, which it later received. While Jeffersonwas President, his Secretary of State, James Madison, continued his workwithin the government. He highly approved of the idea of the federalgovernment being that natins ultimate authority over each individualstates government. Both ideas of Jefferson and Madison were incorporatedin the Constitution, and add to the sensibility and reason of theConstitution as a whole. In 1990, Czech President Vaclav Havel imposedupon the US Congress, Wasnt it the best minds of your countrywho wroteyour famous Declaration of Independence, you Bill of Human Rights, and youConstitution? those great documentsinspire us all; they inspire usdespite the fact that they are over two hundred years old. They inspire usto be citizens. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French aristocrat, believed thatdemocratic citizenship was the equivalent of enlightened self-interest. Hewas also extremely impressed by Americas experiment with democracy, andhow well it worked. With observations made by important figures from oldcountries, it is only fair that we call the American Republic, since it hashad such an impact on the world since it was established as well. Nowonder we stand straight when we pledge allegiance to our country through aflag salute of a nation with liberty and justice for all.

Lifespan Personality Towards explaining President Barrack Obamas Personality Traits

Individuals go through different developmental phases as they negotiate diverse experiences from childhood to adulthood, otherwise known as lifespan. The experiences are mainly determined by both nature and nurture influences, and plays a central role in determining an individual’s personality (Grogorenko Sternberg, 2003).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Lifespan Personality: Towards explaining President Barrack Obama’s Personality Traits specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More It is imperative to note at this early stage that consecutive studies on developmental phases through the lifespan has yielded many theories that attempt to explain the mental, emotional, cognitive, and social development experienced by individuals. This paper purposes to critically analyze what forces have impacted the life of U.S. President Barrack Obama from the perspective of developmental psychology by applying two theories o f personality in the analyses of the influences throughout the lifespan. Heredity and Environmental Influences Psychologists largely believe that both heredity and environmental factors play a fundamental role in the development of a multiplicity of personality traits (Knafo Plomin, 2006). Personality can be exclusively described as the continuing or long-term patterns of thought, values, world views, and behavior that an individual projects or expresses in diverse circumstances (Shaffer, 2009; Polak et al, 2010). By any standards, Obama is charismatic, ambitious, and goal-directed (Jittan Immelman, 2008). He is confident, analytical, thoughtful, sensitive, and energetic, not mentioning the fact that he is independent and open in both thought and action. The above personality traits, though not conclusive, can be used to describe the person of the 44th president of the U.S. President Obama’s cognitive and intellectual aptitudes largely demonstrated through his sharp thinkin g and leadership approach can be attributed to heredity influences, especially with the realization that his father was an astute civil servant in post-independence Kenya. Heredity influences occur when genetic characteristics are transmitted from the parents to the offspring. His skin color and hair type are genetic factors that must have influenced his social and emotional development especially in socialization processes. Obama’s resilient and goal-directed nature can be attributed to the experiences he underwent as a child and youth due to the heredity influences described above. Environmental influences are thought to have the biggest role in determining personality traits of individuals (Shaffer, 2009). According to the author, personality characteristics are not only determined in part by environmental influences, but they influence how individuals adjust to the immediate environment and how they respond to particular situations.Advertising Looking for essay on ps ychology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Obama cuts across a figure of a person who is emotionally stable, morally straight, and cognitively superior as demonstrated by his accomplished oratory skills, leadership qualities, confident, sensitive, thoughtful, and attentive nature. These characteristics can be attributed to environmental influences that the president experienced while growing up in a single-family setup and in school. According to Myers (2009), Obama’s â€Å"†¦black African father, white American mother, Muslim middle name, and childhood spent partially in Asia make him more that the 21st-century embodiment of the classic American melting pot† (para. 5). The cultural environment in which young Obama grew explains his assertive and competitive nature (Shaffer, 2009). Family Issues and Support Systems It is safe to argue that family issues must have played a significant role in the developmental grow th and adjustment of President Obama. First, Obama was born out of a multi-racial relationship between an African father and a white American mother (Myers, 2009). This must have had a profound effect on Obama’s personality development. According to Shaffer (2009), the personality development of individuals is affected by whether such individuals have other siblings, and also by the order in which the siblings are born in the family context. Reliable sources say that Obama had a junior sister, hence he was the first born in the family. His parents separated when Obama was young. According to Shaffer (2009), first-born children live to become more achievement-oriented, independent, and responsible. This can be used to explain Obama’s mastery of the above named attributes. Shaffer (2009) asserts that â€Å"†¦the home environment parents provide for their children is influenced in part by the parents own genotypes†¦And because parents also provide their childre n with genes, it so happens that the learning environments to which children are exposed are correlated with†¦their own genotypes (p. 82). This statement reveals how heredity and environment come into play in the family context to influence an individual’s personality development. In support systems, Obama was said to be a high performer both in high school and college (Myers, 2009). Here, it can be said that his physical characteristics (good looks) and emotional stability (outgoing nature) influenced his developmental growth and adjustment during his formative years.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Lifespan Personality: Towards explaining President Barrack Obama’s Personality Traits specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Physical attraction comes as a result of heredity influences while emotional stability can be occasioned by both heredity and environmental influences. According to Shaffer (2009 ), physically attractive students are more likely to be treated favorably and auspiciously than their less attractive counterparts, hence heightening their confidence and energy levels as revealed in the case of Obama. Theories of Personality Development There exist many theories of personality development that attempts to explain how individuals maneuver their way through the different developmental phases. Sigmund Freud’s psychosocial theory and Watson’s social learning theory of can be applied to explain Obama’s personality development. In psychosexual theory, Freud argued that individuals are largely driven by drives and conflicts that they are oblivious of, not mentioning the fact that their personalities is overwhelmingly shaped by early childhood experiences (Shaffer, 2009). It is up to the individual to control the powerful biological urges that seeks to be fulfilled since society view them as undesirable. According to Shaffer, â€Å"†¦the way in w hich parents have managed these sexual and aggressive urges in the first few years of life play a major role in shaping the child’s future conduct and character† (p. 39). Freud comes up with the stages of psychological development and suggests that a child must successfully pass through the stages and avoid fixation to lead a fulfilling life in adulthood (Polak et al, 2010). On the other hand, Watson postulates that conclusions about individual personality development should be based on observations and interpretations of unconcealed behavior patterns rather than conjecturing about unconscious processes or urges that are not observable. Indeed, Watson believed that â€Å"†¦well learned associations between external stimuli and observable responses†¦are the building blocks of human development† (Shaffer, 2009, p. 44). According to Watson, social environment rather than inborn tendencies are instrumental in individual’s personality development. Con sequently, Sigmund’s psychosocial theory differ in major ways with Watson’s social learning approach as far as explaining Obama’s personality development is concerned. The psychosocial theory seems to suggest that childhood experiences largely determine the personality of an individual in adulthood.Advertising Looking for essay on psychology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In addition, Freud’s childhood experiences are largely as a result of biological urges that cannot be quantitatively measured (Shaffer, 2009). As such, the theory presupposes that Obama must have had a totally fulfilling childhood for him to develop such astute personality characteristics in adulthood. According to Sigmund’s theory, the experiences that Obama had in school and in his role as a senator cannot be said to influence his personality traits since they were informed by his childhood experiences. Watson, however, punches holes on this viewpoint, suggesting that personality traits are largely dependent on the rearing environments. In addition, Watson asserts that the personality traits of children are also dependent on the parents and other significant individuals in the lives of children (Shaffer, 2009; Polak et al, 2010). To conclude, therefore, Watson’s social learning theory best explains the personality traits and accomplishments of president Obama. It can be argued that Obama has gained a lot of experiences from interacting with the social environment. It is wrong to suggest that the president has gained the incredible personality traits through a sequence of divergent stages informed by a process of biological maturation (Shafter, 2009). On the contrary, Obama’s personality traits have been achieved through a continuous process of behavior transformation that is informed by his interactions with the social environment. Reference List Grogorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J. (2003). The nature-nurture issue. In: A. Slater G. Bremmer (Eds), An introduction to developmental psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Knafo, A., Plomin, R. (2006). Parental discipline and affection and children’s pro-social behavior: Genetic and environmental links. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, Vol. 90, Issue 1, p. 147-164. Retrieved from Academic Source Premier Database. Myers, D.D. (2009). Is Obama the most Famous Livi ng Person Ever? Retrieved from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2009/01/is-obama-the-most-famous-living-person-ever Polak, M., Van, H.L., Overeem-Seldenrijk, J., Heiser, W.J., Abraham, R.E. (2010). The developmental profile validation of a theory-driven instrument for personality assessment. Psychotherapy Research, Vo. 20, Issue, 3, P. 259-272. Retrieved from Academic Source Premier Database. Shaffer, D.R. (2009). Social and personality development, 6th Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. This essay on Lifespan Personality: Towards explaining President Barrack Obama’s Personality Traits was written and submitted by user Bristol Woodward to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.